From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Bug in structmode++? Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:59:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87d2sulyp0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20130501150351.GA1891@pedroche.intern> <20130502083120.GJ1647@pedroche.uni-erfurt.de> <877gjhixw9.fsf@gmail.com> <20130502085151.GM1647@pedroche.uni-erfurt.de> <87r4hph59q.fsf@gmail.com> <878v3s829x@ch.ristopher.com> <87ip2v83j3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878v3qkghd@ch.ristopher.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcB9w-0007u2-MO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 05:04:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcB9u-0006EE-Qh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 05:04:36 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:42935) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UcB9u-0006E1-Ke for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 05:04:34 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hi5so233517wib.8 for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 02:04:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878v3qkghd@ch.ristopher.com> (Christopher Schmidt's message of "Tue, 7 May 2013 15:31:53 +0100 (BST)") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christopher Schmidt Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Christopher, Christopher Schmidt writes: > Most people use orgstruct{,++}-mode in message-mode, right? I think it > makes sense to use vanilla org here. That is, make an indirect buffer > of the message-mode buffer, narrow the buffer to the message body and > set the major mode to org-mode. Mhh.. This looks too complex to me. My guess is that message-mode and mail-mode are the modes where orgstruct-mode is the most used, so having it doing what the users expect is important. At least there should be no regression wrt the previous behavior of orgstruct-mode. > This should give one all the power of > Org, including links, footnotes, font-lock and so on, without that > orgstruct-mess. I sympathetize with your blame on the mess... but still, let's fix the code, not users' behavior :) But things are fine for me at the moment, I'll report issues if I find some. Best, -- Bastien