From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: Re: Standardize #+BIBLIOGRAPHY line Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:31:31 +0530 Message-ID: <87d2qaplzo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k3kjyr37.fsf@gmail.com> <87hafn55l0.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip02wx96.fsf@gmail.com> <874nbm67rq.fsf@gmail.com> <87hafmwuhs.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35821) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1JSu-0001UG-RH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:00:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1JSs-0007Ah-4N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:00:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]:44092) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1JSr-00077Q-Nt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:00:01 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kp1so2966171pab.21 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:00:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87hafmwuhs.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:15:59 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > As expressed elsewhere I think > > [cite:key :pre xxx :post yyy :mycrazykey zzz] > > is the most desirable syntax. Where would the pre, post text would go. Will it go as part of "in text" or will it go in to References list or both. For command line based processing, I see foresee issues with: 1. Multiple keys. 2. Stuff like "Ibid." 3. Sort order of keys. 4. Numbering of entries. > The system should exhibit some flexibility supporting e.g. notes, > parencite (prenote, key, year, postnote) and textcite key (prenote, > year, postnote). But there could be others. E.g. someone mentioned > using DOIs etc. > I'd be willing to put in work on ox-bibliography, although I don't > know if my 'skillz' suffice. This is just escaping :-). You already have some ideas on "what"s and "how"s. You put "what" in "what" and "how" in "how". IME, Confusion, lethargy or escapism starts when "what" gets mixed with "how". "Collection" can happen now. "Processing" can happen later.