From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Carriage return in macro
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:11:13 +0530
Message-ID: <87d2ous6pi.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87txig8982.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvtwkb8q.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ob8jowvb.wl%wiskey5alpha@gmail.com> <87eh9bigkq.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35280)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1VFeq2-0000EK-Ac
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 02:39:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1VFeps-0000vI-Rg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 02:39:14 -0400
Received: from mail-pb0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22b]:63249)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kjambunathan@gmail.com>) id 1VFeps-0000vE-KH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 02:39:04 -0400
Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id md4so2708806pbc.2
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 23:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87eh9bigkq.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Fri, 30
	Aug 2013 16:35:57 +0530")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Tim <wiskey5alpha@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Nicolas

In the context of the example below (i.e., the way #+ATTR_ODT are used
/within/ the list) is it fair to say this:

    A #+ATTR_ODT: can be attached only to a plain-list - Visually they
    come before the first item of the top-level list or a nested list.

    Using an #+ATTR_ODT line before a second or subsequent item will
    result in splitting of the original list.

I just want to confirm my understanding of the /existing/ behaviour so
that I can extract maximum juice out of ox.el.

To avoid confusion: Opinions surrounding how comments and meta lines
influence the list structure doesn't bother me one way or the other.

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:

> #+ATTR_ODT: :style "OrgBulletedList" :p-style "Text_20_body_20_bold"
> 1. N1
>    1. N11
>    2. N12
> 2. N2
>    #+ATTR_ODT: :style "OrgNumberedList" :p-style "Preformatted_20_Text"
>    * B21
>
>    * B22
>      - B221
>
>        First paragraph.
>
>        #+ATTR_ODT: :style "OrgBibliographyList" :p-style "Text_20_body"
>        1. one
>        2. two
>        3. three
>
>        #+ATTR_ODT: :style "Text_20_body_20_indent"
>        Second paragraph.
>
>      - B222
>    * B23
> 3. N3