From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Babel] :colnames "no" no longer default for Emacs Lisp [Was]
 Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument listp hline)
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 06:21:04 -0600
Message-ID: <87d2ntw22n.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <86zjr3bp2y.fsf@somewhere.org> <87ob7j15ci.fsf@gmail.com>
	<86fvsuk3tw.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46106)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1VPtqO-0006Qr-4F
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 08:42:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1VPtqG-0007Su-As
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 08:41:56 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]:51001)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1VPtqG-0007Sg-3n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 08:41:48 -0400
Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id g10so3728235pdj.12
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2013 05:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

>
> I always wondered why emacs-lisp is the _only_ language with ":colnames no" as
> its default. Is there a reason therefore?  If no really good reason, could we
> suppress that?
>

This seemed to make sense early on because Emacs Lisp could easily
process hlines itself, but at this point it adds more confusion than it
is worth.  I've reverted this default for elisp, hopefully it doesn't
break too many peoples existing Org-mode files.

Best,

-- 
Eric Schulte
https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
PGP: 0x614CA05D