From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:20:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2itr2gd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87d2j5avwl.fsf@building.gnus.org> <878utkgz36.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqh4fjfu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ppmwx8mp.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <877g938loa.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwhy4pws.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <874n45vcia.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <8738jpa80v.fsf@moondust.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDH1C-0005oy-U4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:21:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDH16-0005mB-BR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:21:10 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46547) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WDH16-0005m0-4m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:21:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDH15-0000oo-Ll for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:21:03 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8738jpa80v.fsf@moondust.localdomain> (N. Jackson's message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:12:00 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "N. Jackson" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, 5753-done@debbugs.gnu.org nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) writes: > Bastien, you misunderstood what I wrote (sorry). > > I _did_ build 24.3.50(.1) from the current (yesterday's) trunk from > Bazaar. I was confused because my Emacs version is 24.3.50.6 so I thought you had an much older one... > And, assuming the failure of shift selection in cua-mode _is_ the bug > the OP was reporting (I was never clear about that), then the bug _is_ > fixed using that build Good, closing it now. > You're welcome, but clearly I need to improve my clarity! Well, I'm not a native english speaker and I sometimes read too hastily, no problem! -- Bastien