From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin Borkowski Subject: Re: How to differentiate between lists in HTML export Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 22:36:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87d28wcayy.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> References: <8761eue8dw.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87ppd2ay9a.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fvdtcjy0.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87bnogwzmc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnaAb-00023W-Ua for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 16:37:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnaAV-0001P4-59 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 16:37:13 -0500 Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:41365) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnaAU-0001Oo-UI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2014 16:37:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2411242066 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 22:37:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TI+Vomkn4N84 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 22:37:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (99-229.echostar.pl [213.156.99.229]) by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D904142062 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2014 22:37:04 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <87bnogwzmc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Org-Mode mailing list On 2014-11-09, at 09:24, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> Thanks, but this is not really what I'd like to have: the strings >> generated by org-export-get-ordinal are /not/ unique throughout the file >> (they seem to be unique within one level of hierarchy). > > They should be unique. How did you use this function? Sorry for the noise, it seems to be working now. (I threw out the code, but AFAIR the non-uniqueness arised with ordinals of /items/ in different lists.) > Regards, Thanks, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Adam Mickiewicz University