From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Extending the @@html: making for other content ? Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:28:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87d22zc7az.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87sibv0zhw.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkAoy-0000bW-B9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:29:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkAov-0002Fg-4h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:29:04 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkAou-0002FZ-UM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:29:01 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YkAor-0003VW-H9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:28:57 +0200 Received: from 46.166.186.233 ([46.166.186.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:28:57 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 46.166.186.233 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:28:57 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Olivier Berger writes: > I wonder whether the @@html:...@@ syntax for embedding raw HTML is > extensible/customizable, for instance for embedding other stuff. AFAIK, for all backends, @@BACKEND: code-snippet@@ will work. > I imagine one could use @@rdf:...@@ for instance. Maybe a macro would be better? > How would one do that ? See e.g. org-latex-export-snippet. > I can't figure out much doc or matching sources to check for hints. They are called export-snippets. Hope it helps, Rasmus -- It was you, Jezebel, it was you