From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ANN] Export block syntax change Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 13:40:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87d1u09dqi.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87vb7sakyj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aAzjT-00048z-3H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 07:38:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aAzjS-0002Tw-Aw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 07:38:31 -0500 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:56438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aAzjS-0002Tl-4V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2015 07:38:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Ken Mankoff's message of "Mon, 21 Dec 2015 06:09:09 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ken Mankoff Cc: Org Mode List Hello, Ken Mankoff writes: > Does this new syntax support that oft (or occasionally?) requested > LaTeX header export? This syntax doesn't introduce any new feature. > I don't think so out of the box, because while LaTeX is a valid export word, LaTeX_preamble is not. > > But, can the new syntax be used like this? > > \include{preamble} > #+BEGIN_EXPORT LaTeX :file preamble.tex > % preamble commands go here > #+END_EXPORT No, it cannot. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou