From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul R Subject: Re: Bug in iCalendar export Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 11:29:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87bq2pfogv.fsf@gmail.com> References: <854.1212005012@alphaville.zko.hp.com> <87iqwyf8gi.fsf@gmail.com> <20080528220551.GJ20846@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1eRm-0001Eg-Be for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 05:29:22 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1eRh-0001Dg-C9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 05:29:20 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53711 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1eRf-0001DU-Ul for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 05:29:16 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.188]:29661) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K1eRe-0005cs-KZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 29 May 2008 05:29:15 -0400 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so2721770mue.6 for ; Thu, 29 May 2008 02:29:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080528220551.GJ20846@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> (Adam Spiers's message of "Wed\, 28 May 2008 23\:05\:51 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Adam Spiers writes: > I'm not sure this bug is specific to Debian - it has been plaguing me > on Fedora... unless there are two separate causes of the same error > message. Do Fedora have a similar distribution system for side-wide lisp ? > To be honest I'm not even convinced it's directly related to orgmode. It isn't, I experienced it with emacs-jabber once. > In my case it looks related to uniquify, but you (Paul) already said > that you are not using uniquify, which is weird. I didn't, but since you mentionned it, I tried it and loved it, so now I do use uniquify and enjoy it everyday :) -- Paul