From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: Vertical split in Emacs 23 Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:13:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87bpnkl1j8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87tz1dsulc.fsf@gmail.com> <87vdltom3d.fsf@in-ulm.de> <87skgxf5wz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRZCh-0001B2-Vh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:13:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRZCc-00013i-T4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:13:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46083 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRZCc-00013M-Lt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:13:22 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f193.google.com ([209.85.216.193]:42504) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MRZCc-0008VF-Cd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:13:22 -0400 Received: by pxi31 with SMTP id 31so258362pxi.14 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:13:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87skgxf5wz.fsf@gmail.com> (Paul Mead's message of "Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:22:52 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Paul Mead Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Paul, Paul Mead writes: > Having thought about this a bit more, I can see where the new behaviour > might be useful, but it just looks a bit ugly in org-mode because (I > guess) it's not been written to deal with narrower buffers. can you provide a screenshot showing a case where org-mode looks ugly with Emacs default split behavior? Then I might have a look... Thanks! -- Bastien