From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Use `C-c C-x _' for interactively calling `org-timer-stop'
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:08:53 +0200
Message-ID: <87bp8fc0pm.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com>
References: <8762yn6gq0.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37205 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OrH74-0003vj-BE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:14:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1OrH73-0007dM-GG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:14:26 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:37275)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1OrH73-0007dF-Az
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:14:25 -0400
Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so1206813wwb.30
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8762yn6gq0.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,
>>>>> Bastien  writes:

> Unless I missed something, `org-timer-stop' has no keybinding yet. I
> propose to use `C-c C-x _'.

Isn't it C-u C-c C-x , ?

Regards,

-- Nicolas