Re: Re: Org-mode Code Blocks Manuscript: Request For Comments

["Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com>]

Hi Seb,

Thanks for the proof reading.  I have answers for some of your questions
below.

Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:

>
> Page 9 -- You say that "tags and properties of a node are inherited by its
> sub-nodes". I agree for tags, not for properties (at least, by default).
>

With respect to code blocks properties are inherited by subnodes, at
least all properties which can be used as header arguments are
inherited.

>
> BTW, what happens if there is a name clash with other code blocks (in the same
> document, or in the LOB)?  Though, this is not for your paper...
>

While no behavior is guaranteed in this case (meaning don't do it :)) I
believe that whichever code block is found first will be used, in
practice this would probably mean that local code blocks will override
lob code blocks, but I make no guarantees

>
> Side comment -- Wouldn't you use a standard way of handling the acronyms in
> LaTeX, so that they're expanded when required, and listed at the end of the
> document?  Example of such acro: ESS.
>

I don't understand what you mean by "standard acronyms" can you give a
specific location and how you would suggest it be changed?

Thanks -- Eric