From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: org-babel, R, and org-babel-open-src-block-result
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:37:28 -0700
Message-ID: <87bp3nxsdn.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTin7FR+4cY2xFHyAVdgoqZVmr-E=9vRanUPAjoRj@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38693 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pci0q-00082f-3R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:28:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Pci0p-0002mv-0R
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:28:03 -0500
Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:38943)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Pci0o-0002mm-US
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:28:02 -0500
Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so9118233yxl.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:28:01 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Leo Alekseyev <dnquark@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Leo Alekseyev <dnquark@gmail.com> writes:

> I recently started using org-babel with R, and so far I think it's
> pretty great!  I'm still getting accustomed to org-babel workflow and
> am playing with available options.  I have a couple of questions:
>
> I noticed that C-c C-o (org-babel-open-src-block-result) always gives
> me an empty *Org-Babel Results* buffer, even if there's output printed
> to #+results section.  Is this a bug?  Am I doing something wrong?
>

I have not noticed this myself, can you share an example?

>
> On a similar note, is there an option for the #+ results session to be
> completely suppressed?..  I can see situations where I might simply
> want to send the code to the inferior process and examine the results
> there using :results output :session, or perhaps I'm running the code
> just for the side effects.  It would be nice if I could say e.g.
> :results none.
>

Yes, for a complete list of the available header arguments and their
effects please see
http://orgmode.org/manual/Working-With-Source-Code.html

>
> Thanks and keep up the good work with org-babel!
>
> --Leo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode