From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [babel] Painless integration of source blocks with language
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:23:54 -0700
Message-ID: <87bp3ka458.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikJdwe11ndjHw=wGVG7W9tC6G2Jm8sZHECAaK9y@mail.gmail.com>
	<87lj2ukfia.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4icegwl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<87wrmbwdsm.fsf@gmail.com> <87aaj5tbgl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<AANLkTimkGVZzqj3QS3g1=1qWLvbYk+h+MF5aWFWuWLh4@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33300 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PdUei-0004XN-SN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:24:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1PdUeg-0002KQ-NN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:24:28 -0500
Received: from mail-pz0-f41.google.com ([209.85.210.41]:47600)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1PdUeg-0002K5-Iu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:24:26 -0500
Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so346311pzk.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:24:25 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Seth Burleigh <wburle@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

I briefly mentioned the approach you describe below earlier in this
thread [1], and while I see the appeal of this approach, I think that
the second approach I described in that same message (using offsets
instead of comments) is preferable -- although I am of course open to
being persuaded otherwise.

Best -- Eric

Seth Burleigh <wburle@gmail.com> writes:

> I would just like to throw in a quick idea.
> The easiest way to support noweb tangling is to get org-babel-tangle to
> create nested tags and change detangle to take these into account.
>
> for example, i have the forex_user source block that is tangled.
>
> ;; [[file:~/Dropbox/.rep/clj-forex/clj-forex.org::*User][forex_user]]
> my code...
> ;; [[file:~/Dropbox/.rep/clj-forex/clj-forex.org::*User][embedded_block]]
> my embedded code ...
> ;; embedded_block ends here
> ;; forex_user ends here
>
> corresponding to a forex_user block of
> #+begin_src
>   my code ...
>   <<embedded_block>>
> #+end_src
>
> This would only work for noweb on separate lines and preferably only when
> one block is noweb embedded into one other source block, but i believe that
> this is the most common case anyways. This could be enforced in the
> detangle/tangle code.
>
> Then, a separate minor mode could make these file: markers invisible and
> create a colored overlay pattern per source block code. Saving the file
> would still save the markers, you just wouldnt see them if the minor mode
> was on.

Footnotes: 
[1]  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/35863/focus=35971