From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Clemente <n142857@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: making coloured tables
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:17:12 +0200
Message-ID: <87bowe50xz.wl%n142857@gmail.com>
References: <CALPHr6wOqmzAMPbVG9Enw6Hy+22azqCi9ab9TemC591Y_mFz-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<80zkjzlb50.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34072)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n142857@gmail.com>) id 1QmKqM-0004lB-Uf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:17:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n142857@gmail.com>) id 1QmKqM-0008ND-0D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:17:18 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:41316)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n142857@gmail.com>) id 1QmKqL-0008N3-On
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:17:17 -0400
Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so1858094wyg.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:17:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <80zkjzlb50.fsf@somewhere.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

El Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:30:19 +0200 Sebastien Vauban va escriure:
> if they seem to make sense... So, here's my idea: having some automagic style
> (background) applied on the cells to distinguish:
> 
> - the input cells (the ones you cannot delete... without troubles): they don't
>   have any formula associated with them
> 
> - the final result cells: the ones with computed results
> 
> - the other ones, whose content is computed, but serves as input to other
>   cells.
> 

  This would be very useful. I see 3 types of cells (apart from headers, comment rows, etc.):
- cells not affected by formulae
- cells used in some formula calculation
- cells whose value was written by a formula (some of them may also be of the second type)