From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug: babel: results switch (output vs. value) has no or wrong
 effect for sh source block [7.7 (release_7.7.107.g7a82)]
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:10:52 -0600
Message-ID: <87bovgdoza.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CALPHr6w_hwhh7q-pGtqgHx43OUUJQpQKE+2jnLOUazD+AmzgVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pqk1o39w.fsf@gmail.com> <loom.20110819T204348-795@post.gmane.org>
	<87pqjybpg7.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CALn3zoh6rKeRSrtF3MXJqzWbbuGELnhC1rZv=CzmQSDr80nbyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ei0ccd9u.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38179)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Qvue9-0007mm-UJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:20:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Qvue8-0002tH-Dd
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:20:17 -0400
Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:51074)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Qvue8-0002t9-4x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:20:16 -0400
Received: by gyg10 with SMTP id 10so287228gyg.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:

> Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com> writes:
>> If the shell is a special case for babel anyway, why not something
>> like the following?
>
> Ehm, no.  But I think that it would be generally useful (not just for
> shell blocks) to be able to capture stderr, either together with stdout
> or separately into a result target block and have the return status
> available as a variable (although that does not work for consecutive
> invocations in a session).
>

Hmm, I do think that a ":results stderr" option could be useful, however
this would not be a trivial implementation as it may require adjustments
to all of the language files.

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/