From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] loop over headlines in active region
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:10:42 +0200
Message-ID: <87bout7nv1.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
References: <87obzpl3ec.fsf@gnu.org>
	<1314246334-5053-1-git-send-email-dmaus@ictsoc.de>
	<87d3ftiz11.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkitabb4.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
	<87bouw404u.fsf@gmail.com> <87obyu4awt.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
	<877h5i3tbc.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Sep__9_17:10:41_2011-1";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35274)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dmaus@ictsoc.de>) id 1R22j9-00014C-2z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:10:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dmaus@ictsoc.de>) id 1R22j6-0008Vs-LC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:10:47 -0400
Received: from app1b.xlhost.de ([213.202.242.162]:44081)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dmaus@ictsoc.de>) id 1R22j6-0008Vk-Gf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:10:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <877h5i3tbc.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?UTF-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= <stepnem@gmail.com>
Cc: David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Sep__9_17:10:41_2011-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:26:31 +0200,
=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec wrote:
>=20
> Still, I'd rather we stuck to the point and expressed ourselves in a way
> that doesn't imply the other side is either an idiot ...

Your message simply repeated my conclusion: Yes, the problem of
referencing a free variable in the macro expansion does not apply in
this case. Yes, I should base decisions on valid arguments (Who
shouldn't?). Yes, the fact that I refrained from implementing it as a
macro indicates that I wanted to implement it as a macro in the first
place.

Repeating and stating the very, very obvious is one way to call
someone an idiot.
--=20
OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6
Jabber.... dmjena@jabber.org
Email..... dmaus@ictsoc.de

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Sep__9_17:10:41_2011-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EABEIAAYFAk5qLHEACgkQma24O1pEeOab3AEA25RVBUjQWxe7AyMIyv/ebhOH
1hPuUAHexAwKk1xLJmQA/2LHBpk2hOvinh0smE8JVqS++nIctaQ8nTR/2+MjO8Bd
=C4zS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Sep__9_17:10:41_2011-1--