From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: TODO keyword completion bug
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:02:42 +0200
Message-ID: <87boi4qtxp.fsf@altern.org>
References: <877gss98lr.fsf@dimension8.tehua.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39588)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1T3o6F-0005qo-62
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:02:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1T3o6A-0002RF-2N
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:02:27 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:46361)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1T3o69-0002R1-SL
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:02:21 -0400
Received: by wibhn17 with SMTP id hn17so3971015wib.12
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <877gss98lr.fsf@dimension8.tehua.net> (Aidan Gauland's message of
	"Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:23:12 +1200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Aidan Gauland <aidalgol@no8wireless.co.nz>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Aidan,

Aidan Gauland <aidalgol@no8wireless.co.nz> writes:

> I have some (buffer-local) keywords defined that contain dashes to
> separate words (because I couldn't think of a single word that would be
> clear).  M-<TAB> completion does not appear to work for these keywords.
>
> This has made me reconsider my choice of keywords, but since they're
> valid keywords, shouldn't they be valid candidates for completion
> (i.e. is this a bug)?

"Keywords" is ambiguous here.

TODO keywords like "MY-TODO" complete fine with M-TAB.

#+MY_KEYWORD does not complete fine with M-TAB, but since this keyword
appears in the buffer anyway, you can simply use M-/.

HTH,

-- 
 Bastien