From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philipp Kroos Subject: Re: subtree-export limitations Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:23:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87boevqhnt.fsf@t-online.de> References: <87r4ntmu00.fsf@t-online.de> <20121116163645.GF24384@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87lie0bemn.fsf@t-online.de> <87y5i0o0nd.fsf@gmail.com> <87txsonyka.fsf@gmail.com> <877gpkb6wq.fsf@t-online.de> <878va0nrrh.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta2yE-0004MY-25 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 06:23:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta2yB-0006bb-0O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 06:23:25 -0500 Received: from mailout07.t-online.de ([194.25.134.83]:49648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ta2yA-0006bL-Pr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 06:23:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878va0nrrh.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:00:50 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Philipp Kroos writes: > >> That said, I'm fine with the situation, but I'ld suggest a note in the >> documentation that makes this limitation to subtree-exports clear (and >> possibly points out the workarounds). What do you think? > > Sure. What should be written in that note? Where to put it? Or, better, > do you want to provide a patch for that? > > > Regards, In general, I'ld want to, yes. But now i've realized that this concerns the users of contrib/* only.. The main documentation is sufficient for the standard, I think. Are there attempts to port the documentation to the new features already? Best regards, Philipp