From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Carriage return in macro
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:38:00 +0200
Message-ID: <87bo4enihj.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87txig8982.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvtwkb8q.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ob8jowvb.wl%wiskey5alpha@gmail.com> <87eh9bigkq.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87d2ous6pi.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56587)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VFkRB-0000ah-IS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 08:38:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VFkR3-0000Qn-5D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 08:37:57 -0400
Received: from mail-ea0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::22e]:57203)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1VFkR2-0000Qc-PK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 08:37:49 -0400
Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z15so1401548ead.19
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2013 05:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87d2ous6pi.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Sat, 31
	Aug 2013 12:11:13 +0530")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Tim <wiskey5alpha@gmail.com>

Hello,

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:

> In the context of the example below (i.e., the way #+ATTR_ODT are used
> /within/ the list) is it fair to say this:
>
>     A #+ATTR_ODT: can be attached only to a plain-list - Visually they
>     come before the first item of the top-level list or a nested list.
>
>     Using an #+ATTR_ODT line before a second or subsequent item will
>     result in splitting of the original list.
>
> I just want to confirm my understanding of the /existing/ behaviour so
> that I can extract maximum juice out of ox.el.

That's correct: items cannot get affiliated keywords (see list of
exceptions at line 32 in org-element.el).


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou