From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: problem with ox-pandoc export Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 23:31:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87bnfuutyv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87a8vmv5vq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pp4htpk1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878ub2k8pq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mlqjqfk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mvzg827w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86k2uioquy.fsf@example.com> <87ioa2n68f.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877fqisr7f.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43279) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAm3s-0000qs-1I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:30:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAm3r-0008Bm-3C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:30:23 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:34694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAm3q-0008BY-UH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:30:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877fqisr7f.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:02:12 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Why do we need a pandoc exporter? And why do we need it in core? Note that I said "would be nice", not "need". Pandoc has quite a few export formats that we will probably never have an export back-end for. It avoids re-inventing the wheel. Also Pandoc can export to Org syntax. It seems fair to allow the reciprocal. Regards,