From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: EXPORT_LATEX_HEADER property Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:26:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87bn6vpzud.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43261) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abRMR-0002uL-4Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 06:24:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abRMM-0007xH-Us for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 06:24:02 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:52669) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1abRMM-0007wC-Od for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 06:23:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Fabrice Popineau's message of "Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:02:47 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Fabrice Popineau Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hello, Fabrice Popineau writes: > First, I can't find where is documented the difference between > :EXPORT_LATEX_HEADER: > and > :EXPORT_LATEX_HEADER+: See (info "(org) Property syntax"). > Second, when I use several lines with > :EXPORT_LATEX_HEADER+: > they are concatenated into a single line. Correct. > This is annoying because: > > :PROPERTIES: > :EXPORT_LATEX_HEADER+: \usepackage{mathptmx} % rm & math > :EXPORT_LATEX_HEADER+: \usepackage[scaled=0.90]{helvet} % ss > ... > :END: > > results in > > \usepackage{mathptmx} % rm & math \usepackage[scaled=0.90]{helvet} % ss > > which is obviously unintended. > > Could it be possible to add a '\n' between those lines? Not quite what you are asking for, but couldn't you simply not comment each line? Actually :PROPERTY: A :PROPERTY+: B is meant to be an equivalent for :PROPERTY: A B Introducing newline characters would break this expectation. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou