From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Space after an inline emacs call affects output on export Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:21:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87bn5mc1p6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87vb3unct3.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87h9fediaq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r3einapk.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35940) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1annMq-00006b-Eq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:19:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1annMp-0007N5-Nk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:19:32 -0400 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:41415) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1annMp-0007Mu-Hi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:19:31 -0400 Received: from selenimh (unknown [IPv6:2a03:a0a0:0:4301::2de]) (Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 663C8A80C8 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:19:30 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87r3einapk.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:11:35 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric S Fraga writes: > However, I am curious as to why the output from the inline source > evaluation is different? I.e. why =xxx= versus xxx? What is the > rationale for one versus the other? The result of the inline source evaluation is =xxx= (I'll ignore the no-op results macro around it). If =xxx= can be parsed as a verbatim object, it becomes \textt{xxx} in the output. If it cannot, = signs appear as-is in the output. In the second case, something is preventing =xxx= from being parsed as a verbatim object. Regards,