From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Welle Subject: Re: Creating consecutive time stamps Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 18:40:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmsc3z3c.fsf@luisa.c0t0d0s0.de> References: <87inmk4pyr.fsf@luisa.c0t0d0s0.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvRW4-0005yi-P8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:41:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvRVz-0002C9-U7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:41:12 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:63836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvRVz-0002Bl-Ix for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:41:07 -0400 Received: from stella.c0t0d0s0.de ([2.247.241.115]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFuC6-1crdtH00HO-00EqqL for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 18:41:05 +0200 Received: from Stella (stella.c0t0d0s0.de [192.168.42.1]) by stella.c0t0d0s0.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F091C50DB for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 18:40:55 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 4 Apr 2017 12:49:15 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello Carsten, Carsten Dominik writes: > Hi MIchael, > > the automatic reset of the starting date for a second time stamp on works > if the command `org-time-stamp' is invoked twice in direct succession. So > if you press `C-c .' to insert a time stamp, and then you press it > immediately again, the magic will take its course. This is probably the > situation that you remember. ah, suddenly all makes sense ;). I changed the template a couple of years ago. It could well be that I inserted both time stamps vie C-c. before the change. > However, if you use %T in a template, then `last-command' is `org-capture', > and the time stamp command does not know that you are making a range. I > could, by looking back and finding <...>-- , but that is not implemented. > You might be better off Using an empty template and then inserting both > time stamps with `C-c .' - which will make it easy to also directly choose > the starting date. Yes, that's way faster than navigation the calendar two times, esp. if the appointment is far in the future. Thank you hmw