From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: TIMEZONE property for ical export Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2017 23:20:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmnbjluz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87ziawx1f7.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fucolzv5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87a82vv5up.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k21zjr6x.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fucns553.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37489) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djBAR-0000Eb-Fr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:20:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djBAO-00006F-Aj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:20:27 -0400 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:60683) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djBAO-0008SY-3l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:20:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fucns553.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sat, 19 Aug 2017 12:56:40 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Eric Abrahamsen writes: > It's a little strange, because the manual section for this specifically > mentions the inheritance of the LOCATION property, but the code doesn't > do it. Shall I add it in? It makes sense for LOCATION and TIMEZONE to be > inheritable, but not SUMMARY and DESCRIPTION, of course. > > If I add inheritance, that will look like this, right? > > (tz (org-export-get-node-property :LOCATION entry > (org-property-inherit-p :LOCATION))) It should be: (org-property-inherit-p "LOCATION") > That could also be a separate, second commit. I think that would be better. > I've added an ORG-NEWS entry. The patch in my last message was done with > git format-patch, isn't that commit message okay? It is. I just need to read better. Regards,