From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Bug: org-2ft and/or float-time is wrong [9.1.2 (9.1.2-22-ga2a034-elpaplus @ ~/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20171023/)] Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 19:23:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmknkwhe.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56593) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9bBy-0004XR-6i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:23:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9bBx-0008NA-DT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:23:14 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:55625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e9bBx-0008MG-7G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 14:23:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Allen Li's message of "Mon, 30 Oct 2017 21:33:37 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Allen Li Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Allen Li writes: > Removing the t for zone fixes it [...] > I will also note that the FIXME comment in org-parse-time-string > suggests that it too is not handling timezones correctly. In fact, > perhaps org-parse-time-string should not take a zone argument, since > Org does not support timezones thus the only valid value for zone is > nil. I suspect that org-display-custom-time, another caller that > passes t for zone, is also timezone incorrect. Both changes were introduced to fix some issues with daylight saving time, in particular in clock reports. It is not possible to simply suggest reverting them without considering the underlying issues. I agree there are issues to fix. Unfortunately, the solution you suggest is not sufficient. > tl;dr time is hard. I agree. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou