Hi Nicolas, I think there are also some relevant points which I haven’t mentioned so far, separate from my thoughts that since we’re using the LaTeX syntax we should be consistent with how LaTeX treats this. > As I wrote above, they do not belong to the same category of syntax. > There’s no reason to special case .... I think we already do special-case `\[ ... \]' somewhat. When refer to inline elements like bold, verbatim, italic, etc. they sit in the text. Semantically, this doesn’t hold for `\[ ... \]' either. The semantically inline maths element is `\( ... \)'. Considering other “inline” syntax elements, like bold, verbatim, italic, etc. if you spread the delimiters across multiple lines that doesn’t work. So I’d argue the ship has already sailed on treating `\[ ... \]' differently to other inline elements. If you’re wondering why I’m so opposed to the current behaviour, that is probably best explained by a more realistic demo that what I have in the commit message. ┌──── │ Since \(\cos\) is an even function, we can negate the numerator of the argument │ without changing the result, giving │ \[ │ \cos \left( \pi \frac{C_1-x}{2C_1+D} \right) \ , \quad C_1 = \frac{D}{2}. │ \] │ this will be positive over \(x \in (0,D)\), and so we can rewrite \(\tilde{y}\) as, │ \[ │ \tilde{y}(x) = \frac{2D}{\pi} \log \cos \left( \pi \frac{\frac{D}{2}-x}{2D} \right) + C_2. │ \] │ Once again considering that \(y(0)=y(D)=0\), it is clear that │ \[ │ C_2 = - \frac{2D}{\pi} \log \cos \left( \frac{\pi}{4} \right) = - \frac{2D}{\pi} \log 2^{-\frac{1}{2}} = \frac{D}{\pi} \log 2. │ \] │ The complete solution for \(\tilde{y}\) is hence, │ \[ │ \tilde{y} = \frac{2D}{\pi} \log \cos \left( \pi \frac{D-2x}{4D} \right) + \frac{D}{\pi} \log 2. │ \] └──── is currently filled to ┌──── │ Since \(\cos\) is an even function, we can negate the numerator of the argument │ without changing the result, giving \[ \cos \left( \pi \frac{C_1-x}{2C_1+D} │ \right) \ , \quad C_1 = \frac{D}{2}. \] this will be positive over \(x \in (0,D)\), │ and so we can rewrite \(\tilde{y}\) as, \[ \tilde{y}(x) = \frac{2D}{\pi} \log \cos \left( \pi │ \frac{\frac{D}{2}-x}{2D} \right) + C_2. \] Once again considering that │ \(y(0)=y(D)=0\), it is clear that \[ C_2 = - \frac{2D}{\pi} \log \cos \left( │ \frac{\pi}{4} \right) = - \frac{2D}{\pi} \log 2^{-\frac{1}{2}} = \frac{D}{\pi} \log 2. │ \] The complete solution for \(\tilde{y}\) is hence, \[ \tilde{y} = \frac{2D}{\pi} \log \cos │ \left( \pi \frac{D-2x}{4D} \right) + \frac{D}{\pi} \log 2. \] └──── Suffice to say, I find the second terrible to read compared to the first. Furthermore, when using org-latex-preview, wrapped `\[ ... \]' blocks join lines, resulting in lines that are displayed going off edge of the page after filling. Basically, this leads to a worse experience when using Org in what I would think to be a perfectly reasonably way. All the best, Timothy