From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: BUG? Repeating Deadline with -0d has wrong face in the agenda Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:46:11 -0500 Message-ID: <87ablj7ol8.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JV7RC-000770-1t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:46:18 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JV7R9-00074D-Jo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:46:17 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JV7R9-00073l-9O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:46:15 -0500 Received: from mho-02-bos.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JV7R8-0003ih-T8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:46:14 -0500 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Org Mode Mailing List Hi Carsten, I have a monthly repeating deadline defined as ,----[ Org file entry ] | * Some Client | *** TODO Invoicing and Archive Tasks | DEADLINE: <2008-03-01 Sat +1m -0d> `---- Deadlines normally appear in the agenda in all red text (which is great!) as they get closer to the due date. This works fine for DEADLINE: <2008-03-01 Sat +1m -1d> However I don't need any advance warning on this task. I want it to get done on time and not bug me until that day shows up. So I use the -0d entry. This works but the task doesn't stand out on the agenda as a red deadline. It's black like any other deadline due some number of days in the future. Could we make a special case for -0d so it's red - since the deadline is due the day it shows up? Thanks, Bernt