From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: suggestion for file hyperlink
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:20:27 +0200
Message-ID: <87ab442o1g.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ>
References: <4A3BAEE2.2030806@alumni.ethz.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MHglV-00036i-9P
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:16:33 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MHglQ-00030Q-OC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:16:32 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45970 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHglQ-00030L-GM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:16:28 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:49043)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>) id 1MHglP-0004bc-Lj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:16:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4A3BAEE2.2030806@alumni.ethz.ch> (Michael Brand's message of
	"Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:29:38 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Michael Brand <michael.brand@alumni.ethz.ch>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


First of all: Return key broken? Those mails are hard to read (mixed
long lines and code - see below).


Second:

This works: [[file:/path to/my file.txt]]


Regards,

  Sebastian

Michael Brand <michael.brand@alumni.ethz.ch> writes:
> suggestion for file hyperlink, from my point of view almost a bug:
>
> I can understand that the following line in the file work.org can not hyperlink
> to the file '/path to/my file.txt': - todo: send file:/path to/my file.txt to
> Bill But I would like very much - todo: send file:'/path to/my file.txt' to Bill
> and - todo: send file:"/path to/my file.txt" to Bill hyperlink to the file
> instead of to '/path'.
>