From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: A simpler remember architecture (was: Re: Re: is there a hook to save a remember buffer?) Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:39:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87ab0c1ztx.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> References: <20524da70909291348m6e1a6611ve01d6dac2faca93c@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mswb0-0001t9-Jh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:39:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mswav-0001qs-Mo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:39:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50434 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mswav-0001qj-8n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:39:37 -0400 Received: from vscane-c.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.43]:57757) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mswau-0008JZ-P6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:39:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20524da70909291348m6e1a6611ve01d6dac2faca93c@mail.gmail.com> From: Eric S Fraga List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode At Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:48:53 -0700, Samuel Wales wrote: > > Hi Carsten, > > Here is an idea for a much simpler remember architecture that > simultaneously solves Alan's problem. [...] > 5) Here is my idea: discard the concept of remember > buffers entirely. > - Create the entry at the target location when you call > org-remember. > - Employ a virtual buffer to narrow to the created > entry. I like this. Just yesterday, I was in the process of "remembering" something when somebody came by my office. I talked to the person and, during the conversation, I had the need to "remember" something that came up. However, I was already in a remember buffer which was partially completed. I had to finalise this before I could start a new remember and this interrupted the discussion I was having with my colleague. Your approach would have worked perfectly yesterday!