From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: Re: Bug: create latex png while export to HTML become very slow [6.35i] Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:00:56 -0400 Message-ID: <87aat3m28n.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> References: <87ochkacxm.fsf@gmail.com> <8D636DAF-5D4C-4846-A432-7B544131B50D@gmail.com> <10559.1271390362@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87iq7rm5xh.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <13511.1271454603@alphaville.usa.hp.com> <14696.1271457757@alphaville.usa.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2uX3-00061U-4J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:01:05 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44985 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2uX1-00060y-M0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:01:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2uWz-0005FC-0y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:01:03 -0400 Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:57102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2uWy-0005F0-Px for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:01:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <14696.1271457757@alphaville.usa.hp.com> (Nick Dokos's message of "Fri\, 16 Apr 2010 18\:42\:37 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: Lucas Peng , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Nick Dokos writes: > Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> >> On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: >> >> > Bernt Hansen wrote: >> > >> >> Lucas Peng writes: >> >> >> >>> Thanks for your prompt response, >> >>> >> >>> 1. I get "Org-mode version 6.35i" with M-x org-version. >> >> >> >> Strange. The current latest tagged version in the git repo is >> >> release_6.35g >> >> >> >> We haven't gotten to 'i' yet unless you've come back from the >> >> future ;) >> >> >> > >> > I was confused by that too, but the tarball on the website says >> > 6.35i, so >> > my guess was that Carsten forgot to add tags to the git tree. >> >> >> The tags are there, but I pushed them from a branch. >> >> > > Indeed they are. I did ``git fetch --tags'' to get them. Hmmm. Yes they are. Ah they are on a separate branch that master doesn't reference. Sorry for the noise. -Bernt