From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eric Schulte" Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:17:46 -0700 Message-ID: <87aaivzg31.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87mxmx1zat.fsf@fastmail.fm> <874o94bxww.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrs3hge.fsf@gmail.com> <871v48s3xu.fsf@fastmail.fm> <10576.1295493005@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87mxmvy43m.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55791 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfxW7-000802-5A for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:37:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfxW5-0002x6-TD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:37:47 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:61678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfxW5-0002x2-Qh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:37:45 -0500 Received: by gxk5 with SMTP id 5so256598gxk.0 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:37:45 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Matt Lundin Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Jason Dunsmore , Bastien , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Matt Lundin writes: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Matt Lundin wrote: >> >>> So the new, "flat" FAQ is up and running. And, of course, all are >>> welcome to suggest or contribute further refinements. >>> >> >> Blue (or purple or similar color) text on black background is unreadable - >> at least to my eyes. > > I agree. I reverted the black background. > > If a dark background is preferred, we'll need to make sure that we > export an entire dark color theme (such as zenburn) with > org-export-htmlize-generate-css. > Once we replace the current "Classic Worg"/"Next Worg" alternate stylesheets with the zenburn alternative then there will be a coherent option for those preferring a dark background. Also, it may be a slight improvement to replace the existing css used for code highlighting with my previously attached emacs.css -- which uses the default Emacs color scheme, and setting pre {background: #adefef;} /* default Emacs background color */ Cheers -- Eric