From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Let's stick to one list for now
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:06:26 -0700
Message-ID: <87aahgf5rh.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87k4gldb1s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org>
	<4D6B6FFA.50706@gmail.com> <877hcks9qt.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
	<87zkpg8k9r.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55591 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pu6Yh-0007A6-Hc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:07:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Pu6YN-00088j-L4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:06:36 -0500
Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:63061)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1Pu6YN-00088T-Hj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:06:35 -0500
Received: by iyf13 with SMTP id 13so4179794iyf.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:06:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87zkpg8k9r.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> (Julien Danjou's message
	of "Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:34:56 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info> writes:

> On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
>
> The point is that there's no gain in telling people to add "[DEV]" since
> they will forget (I will),

I disagree, [babel] tags have been working very well for some time now,
even if the original poster forgets to add such a tag it often appears
in subsequent replies.

> and there is _no_ lose by splitting a list. I already splitted user
> list in some project and nothing bad happened. :)
>

Again, I disagree.  It is not clear what effect splitting would have on
the list, and I doubt that there is a clean partition between dev and
non-dev for many individual emails (not to mention entire threads).

Best -- Eric