From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [org-babel] switching off (re-)evaluation of code blocks during
 Org export
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:31:33 -0700
Message-ID: <87aa7o5aiy.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <2A2CA71C-50E6-4533-BD40-2D879EF3BBCC@beds.ac.uk>
	<87aa7plzl8.fsf@gmail.com> <8062ictrp3.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<87ty5w5dzs.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehx02i44.fsf@norang.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58902)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RSuC4-00064K-C7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:31:45 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RSuC2-00081T-QS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:31:40 -0500
Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:49119)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1RSuC2-00081G-NQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:31:38 -0500
Received: by iaek3 with SMTP id k3so646378iae.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:31:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87ehx02i44.fsf@norang.ca> (Bernt Hansen's message of "Tue, 22
	Nov 2011 12:15:55 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Cc: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> writes:

> Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>
>>> Hence, maybe we should be able to set 2 possible behaviors[1] for the
>>>`eval'
>>> parameter:
>>>
>>> - one for the interactive mode (yes/query/no), and
>>> - one for the export mode (yes/no, and maybe query as well?).
>>>
>>
>> Agreed,
>>
>> The eval header argument now supports the following four options
>> (updated in the manual under "Specific header arguments").
>>
>> | no or never           | no evaluation anytime                 |
>> | query                 | query before evaluation anytime       |
>> | no-eval or never-eval | no evaluation during export           |
>> | query-eval            | query before evaluation during export |
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Should the last two be named export-no, export-never, and export-query.
> That seems more self-documenting to me.
>

Oh!, I miss-typed the above it should read as follows.

| no or never               | no evaluation anytime                 |
| query                     | query before evaluation anytime       |
| no-export or never-export | no evaluation during export           |
| query-export              | query before evaluation during export |

Thanks for catching this, the documentation has the correct terms.

Best,

>
> I'm going to be confused about the difference between 'no' and 'no-eval'
> in the future.  Since the eval header argument already has 'eval' in it
> is it not more useful to specify these values are export related?
>
> Regards,
> Bernt

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/