From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
To: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Cc: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [org-babel] switching off (re-)evaluation of code blocks during Org export
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:31:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87aa7o5aiy.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ehx02i44.fsf@norang.ca> (Bernt Hansen's message of "Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:15:55 -0500")
Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> writes:
> Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>
>>> Hence, maybe we should be able to set 2 possible behaviors[1] for the
>>>`eval'
>>> parameter:
>>>
>>> - one for the interactive mode (yes/query/no), and
>>> - one for the export mode (yes/no, and maybe query as well?).
>>>
>>
>> Agreed,
>>
>> The eval header argument now supports the following four options
>> (updated in the manual under "Specific header arguments").
>>
>> | no or never | no evaluation anytime |
>> | query | query before evaluation anytime |
>> | no-eval or never-eval | no evaluation during export |
>> | query-eval | query before evaluation during export |
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Should the last two be named export-no, export-never, and export-query.
> That seems more self-documenting to me.
>
Oh!, I miss-typed the above it should read as follows.
| no or never | no evaluation anytime |
| query | query before evaluation anytime |
| no-export or never-export | no evaluation during export |
| query-export | query before evaluation during export |
Thanks for catching this, the documentation has the correct terms.
Best,
>
> I'm going to be confused about the difference between 'no' and 'no-eval'
> in the future. Since the eval header argument already has 'eval' in it
> is it not more useful to specify these values are export related?
>
> Regards,
> Bernt
--
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-22 0:13 [org-babel] switching off (re-)evaluation of code blocks during Org export Torsten Anders
2011-11-22 1:23 ` Eric Schulte
2011-11-22 9:46 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-11-22 14:02 ` Eric Schulte
2011-11-22 17:15 ` Bernt Hansen
2011-11-22 17:31 ` Eric Schulte [this message]
2011-11-27 20:12 ` Torsten Anders
2011-11-28 7:13 ` Eric Schulte
2011-11-28 10:01 ` Torsten Anders
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-11-21 16:37 Torsten Anders
2011-11-21 17:26 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-11-21 17:34 ` Eric Schulte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87aa7o5aiy.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=schulte.eric@gmail.com \
--cc=bernt@norang.ca \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).