From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: [babel][patch] BUG in inline source blocks
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:33:10 -0700
Message-ID: <87aa58aeyn.fsf@gmx.com>
References: <87fwf27w67.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
	<m24nvisic9.fsf@btinternet.com> <m2ty3i1bo6.fsf@btinternet.com>
	<87y5ss6aul.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49098)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1RqvSp-0007iO-6f
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:44:16 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1RqvSn-0001B5-VN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:44:15 -0500
Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:42328
	helo=mailout-us.mail.com) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1RqvSn-0001At-M3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:44:13 -0500
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:

> Martyn Jago <martyn.jago@btinternet.com> writes:
>
>> Martyn Jago <martyn.jago@btinternet.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I experience unexpected behaviour when an inline source block is not
>>>> preceded by whitespace.
>>>>
>>>> Example:
>>>> =======================
>>>> * Test inline
>>>>   This is a functional inline src_R{print("source block")}.
>>>>
>>>>   This (src_R{print("here")}) is not.
>>>> =======================
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Andreas 
>>>
>>> I can confirm this behaviour and provide a patch to allow for inline
>>> source blocks to be preceded by punctuation, or, for instance, enclosed
>>> in parenthesis, as in Andreas' example. Patch is attached for
>>> consideration.
>>>
>>> Best, Martyn
>>
>> This is an updated version of the previous patch, with debug noise
>> removed, and a couple of extra tests.
>>
>> Best, Martyn
>

Thanks for this patch Martyn, I just pushed up your [:punct:] change.

>
> Hi Martyn,
>
> thanks for this patch!  It does half the job for me.  Now export (or
> evaluation) already work.  But in the export I get a space inserted.
>
> I my example, I'd expect "(here)" to appear in the export, but I get "( here)".
>

This should now be fixed.

Best,

>
> Best,
> Andreas
>
>

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/