From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: I'm tripping over #+BABEL: vs. #+PROPERTY:
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:39:45 -0400
Message-ID: <87aa3j2fim.fsf@gmx.com>
References: <21A5E1E970CD46459ECBE86D6CC4B28C5364FAE0@spexch01.WindLogics.local>
	<87ipi72g0q.fsf@gmx.com>
	<21A5E1E970CD46459ECBE86D6CC4B28C5364FAE4@spexch01.WindLogics.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54471)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1S7t71-0006yI-L1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:39:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1S7t6z-00065M-FM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:39:51 -0400
Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:46253)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1S7t6z-00065B-7x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:39:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <21A5E1E970CD46459ECBE86D6CC4B28C5364FAE4@spexch01.WindLogics.local>
	(Ken Williams's message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:32:02 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ken Williams <Ken.Williams@windlogics.com>
Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

> How about a translation of the text for question 2)?
[...]
>> > 2) In the same list of "Incompatible changes", it says "code blocks
>> > are named with - results are named with code block may still be
>> > labeled with named with #+tblname: will be considered to be named
>> > results".  What on earth does that mean??  I would offer a doc patch
>> > but I can't figure it out. =)

Name code blocks with "#+name:" and their results will be named with
"#+results:", e.g.,

  #+name: foo
  #+begin_src emacs-lisp
    :foo
  #+end_src

  #+RESULTS: foo
  : :foo

If you want to include literal data you should also use "#+name:" to
name the data, e.g.,

  #+name: bar
  : bar

For backwards compatibility and inter-operation with existing table
functionality, you can use "#+tblname:" instead of "#+name:" when naming
a table.

  #+tblname: baz
  | foo | bar |
  | baz | quz |

Hope that clarifies. Cheers,

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/