From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Babel related bug in elpa version 20121231 Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 13:33:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9snbyhx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <1342018996.75825.YahooMailNeo@web29804.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <8738ygbpvg.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87mwworttu.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87wqvrc2hu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ip7bsvk0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45270) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrSwS-0005WA-SF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:33:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrSwP-0007Yf-PF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:33:36 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com ([74.125.82.170]:50489) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrSwP-0007YS-Gn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 07:33:33 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r1so8774038wey.1 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 04:33:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ip7bsvk0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:45:03 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > I think you are misunderstanding what packetizing Emacs' builtin > packages means. Stefan Monnier has already said that he intends to have > Org (and other packages that are maintained outside Emacs) as built-in > packages within Emacs so that they become easier to update between > releases of Emacs from ELPA. You said: I hope that a later version of Emacs (not the upcoming 24.3, though) will properly move the bundled Org into a package. For the current meaning of an Emacs package, it means moving Org outside of Emacs' core. >> So I strongly think Org should remain into Emacs' core. > > Nobody said otherwise. Good! -- Bastien