From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Achim Gratz Subject: Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:12:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9qbmb65.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <8738w7c5fh.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppz8upsx.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <878v5wi163.fsf@gmail.com> <87vc8zyiqj.fsf@gmail.com> <874ngjivfs.fsf@gmail.com> <87obera7e1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k3pfa7ad.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2v7o11x.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87mwubgx9u.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehfnmeek.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <8738w3p789.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46905) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEjnb-0003iS-Is for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:12:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEjnW-0007kt-OP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:12:39 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEjnW-0007ko-I6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:12:34 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UEjnp-0007kR-EA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:12:53 +0100 Received: from pd9eb5abd.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.235.90.189]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:12:53 +0100 Received: from Stromeko by pd9eb5abd.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 18:12:53 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Jambunathan K writes: > Emacs lisp has a manual of it's own. I don't see how Org export > reference *cannot* end in Emacs. I said that I'm expecting these references to become part of the manual(s). I still expect that and will try to help it along, but it doesn't necessarily need to take the exact sequence of events that I envisioned. > Bastien is doing what(ever) suits his whims and you are approving of > it. I haven't approved or disapproved anything. I have only stated the plain fact that if my understanding of the future course of events is incorrect, then my comment does not apply (and conversely, if it does, then the issue I've stated needs to be dealt with). > I disapprove of what you are doing, Achim. You're welcome. (Sun Tzu, III/2) Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada