From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Org version of the Org manual
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:17:02 +0100
Message-ID: <87a9pt27nl.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m1bob8cffh.fsf@tsdye.com> <87r4jeqq0i.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<87620k79fo.fsf@gmail.com> <kih2gg$6hh$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<87ip4j5xb8.fsf@gmail.com> <kii1qh$92e$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<87k3ozwb6x.fsf@gmail.com> <kijlq9$855$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54357)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UJUsM-0000yv-3p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:17:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UJUsJ-0003KQ-Kf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:17:13 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]:58919)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1UJUsJ-0003Jv-9L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:17:11 -0400
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hj8so1761405wib.14
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <kijlq9$855$1@ger.gmane.org> (Achim Gratz's message of "Sat, 23
	Mar 2013 08:32:44 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@Nexgo.DE>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Achim Gratz <Stromeko@Nexgo.DE> writes:

> Am 22.03.2013 19:17, schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
>>> You might want to use the (function (lambda ...)) form.
>>
>> Why? (function (lambda ...)) is equivalent to (lambda ...). In fact,
>> `lambda' uses `function' as a subroutine.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/elisp/Anonymous-Functions.html
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1852844/emacs-lisp-difference-between-function-lambda-and-lambda
>
> With Emacs 24.3 and eager macro expoansion the need to do this has
> diminished, but for the benefit of older Emacsen we should probably
> continue the practise.

According to the link you pasted:

  The lambda form has one other effect: it tells the Emacs evaluator and
  byte-compiler that its argument is a function, by using function as
  a subroutine (see below).

I don't think this is a recent addition (recent as in "since Emacs
24.1").

>> So, any objection (or further comment) for that change?
>
> Please go ahead.

Done. Could you commit the other part of your patch?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou