From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve configurability of ox-koma-letter Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:46:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87a9oodd4w.fsf@pank.eu> References: <20130421175957.GA7821@cartman> <878v4adh12.fsf@pank.eu> <20130422112728.GE7821@cartman> <8738uidaxh.fsf@pank.eu> <20130422192216.GD725@kenny.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUmuc-0001K9-ET for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:46:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUmuZ-0006TH-Qu for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:46:14 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:62203) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUmuZ-0006T0-II for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:46:11 -0400 Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com ([10.1.101.213]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MHdX0-1UVsJI3i1s-003QRk for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:46:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130422192216.GD725@kenny.fritz.box> (Viktor Rosenfeld's message of "Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:22:16 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: listuser36@gmail.com Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Viktor Rosenfeld writes: >> Yeah, I guess it's true. Still, since foldmarks depends on which >> envelopes you have at hand it might make sense to have it accept a >> string. In lisp-terms a string is still t. On the other hand the >> current approach is consistent with your approach above so that's a >> merit. > > The more I think about it the more I agree that you should be able to > set any value of foldmarks. The only problem I see is that for other > boolean options one can use `t' whereas for foldmarks one would need to > use `true' (because `t' is a valid configuration value for foldmarks). > But as long as that's documented I see no problem. I will post a patch, > once Alan applies my previous patches. I don't know the details of the exporter well enough on this detail, but perhaps it can be utilized that t =E2=89=A0 "t"; if that's true in the exporter as well. In normal lisp (characterp "t") =3D> t and (characterp t) nil. But I'm not sure if t would be transformed before being able to check. . .=20 Thanks, Rasmus --=20 May the Force be with you