From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: \newpage in HTML export Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 10:31:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9gu6t92.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8738moubd4.fsf_-_@ericabrahamsen.net> <8738mo68fi.fsf@gmail.com> <3389069.jUrlGMUlNA@descartes> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40713) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkW21-0004PC-FB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 04:31:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkW1v-0001he-Tx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 04:31:09 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::233]:63426) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkW1v-0001hL-NH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 04:31:03 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r15so1652215ead.10 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 01:31:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3389069.jUrlGMUlNA@descartes> (=?utf-8?Q?=22R=C3=BCdiger?= Sonderfeld"'s message of "Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:50:53 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=BCdiger?= Sonderfeld Cc: Eric Abrahamsen , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, R=C3=BCdiger Sonderfeld writes: > On Friday 22 November 2013 11:24:17 Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Anyway, I don't think this is a good idea to introduce a new syntax just >> to avoid a one-liner (or a hook, see below). Also, this would only make >> sense in few export back-ends. > > But is it really a new syntax or just support for an existing Emacs=20 > convention? See (info "(emacs) Pages"). > > It seems like a feature which could be supported in many back-ends: LaTeX= ,=20 > ODT, HTML, Texinfo, Ascii, Org, (Groff), maybe even md with pandoc. I do not question this. My point is that introducing this new syntax would bring up nothing that can already be achieved using filters or hooks. So, is this feature a must-have? Or would a filter template in Worg more appropriate in this case? Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou