From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: torys.anderson@gmail.com (Tory S. Anderson)
Subject: completing-read for org-clock-select-task: It works!
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:48:25 -0400
Message-ID: <87a8z2dq3a.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55754)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <torys.anderson@gmail.com>) id 1YaWgj-0002Qx-Dl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:48:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <torys.anderson@gmail.com>) id 1YaWgi-0006Pu-Gt
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:48:41 -0400
Received: from mail-qg0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d]:36260)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <torys.anderson@gmail.com>) id 1YaWgi-0006Pk-D5
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:48:40 -0400
Received: by qgf60 with SMTP id 60so149245qgf.3
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: orgmode list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

In my first attempt at actually adding functionality to an existing emacs library, I've written some code to make `org-clock-select-task' use completing-read instead of the built-in org menu if you set `org-select-task-completing', for those who would find this useful (it now works with Helm). It seems like my functions, which are backed by a hash table, ought to be more capable of removing (non-adjacent) duplicates from the list since the table keys are the strings themselves, but I still see them appearing. Why doesn't the hash table merge the entries (they seem to have identical keys)?

Should this adjustment be useful to anyone else, what would I do next to contribute? As this is a first forray into more public-use elisp, I'm also open to any other suggestions or tips. 

Code at: 
http://www.toryanderson.com/files/helm-org-clock.el