From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: fails to start on 32 bit
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:09:35 +0100
Message-ID: <87a8pvle1c.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87zixyv18r.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60253)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a3Q3V-0006gg-FF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:07:54 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a3Q3P-00064t-Md
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:07:53 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:49642)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1a3Q3P-00064f-Ga
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:07:47 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87zixyv18r.fsf@gmail.com> (Sam Halliday's message of "Sat, 28
	Nov 2015 10:59:00 +0000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sam Halliday <sam.halliday@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Sam Halliday <sam.halliday@gmail.com> writes:

> I discovered an error on startup on a 32 bit Windows build.
>
> The line in org-footnote.el
>
> 	       (format "fn:%x" (random #x100000000))
>
> is too large and this fails with an overflow.
>
> Please consider using a number that is 32bit compatible, I'm sure there
> are plenty of integers in the 32bit range for footnote IDs :-)

Fixed. Thank you.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou