From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [PATCH] new :async feature for org-babel-clojure Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 23:59:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87a8kohrgi.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <56FABD8E.2000705@fgiasson.com> <87twjfcbt6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <570538F9.8030307@fgiasson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40646) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1at07Y-00080a-Ol for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:57:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1at07Y-0005uJ-1U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:57:16 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:44734) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1at07X-0005uE-RT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:57:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Frederick Giasson's message of "Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:17:17 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Frederick Giasson Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Frederick Giasson writes: > Any news regarding these latest fixes to that patch? They look good. Thank you for the heads-up. Could you merge patches 1 2 and 5 (Org series) into a single one for inclusion? As for 3 and 4, I think a more general mechanism for asynchrnous eval'ing would be preferable. Besides, AFAIU, because of ; Wait until the nREPL code finished to be processed (while (not (member "done" status)) (nrepl-dict-put response "status" (remove "need-input" status)) (accept-process-output nil 0.01) (redisplay)) `org-babel-execute:clojure' is still somewhat synchronous, isn't it? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou