From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adrian Bradd <adrian.bradd@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Beamer footnote to definition term printed twice
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 10:39:58 -0400
Message-ID: <87a7o9siip.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87k1nf55x4.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51380)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <adrian.bradd@gmail.com>) id 1g3j4o-0008LW-Rd
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 10:40:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <adrian.bradd@gmail.com>) id 1g3j4j-00066G-Ig
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 10:40:06 -0400
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]:46364)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <adrian.bradd@gmail.com>)
	id 1g3j4j-00065N-Bg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 10:40:01 -0400
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id q12-v6so1535599qkl.13
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 07:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <87k1nf55x4.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Loris Bennett <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Hello,

Looks like in both cases the exported description is identical:

#+begin_latex
  \begin{description}
  \item[{with\footnote{Huh?}}] the 
  footnotes\footnote{OK}?\footnotetext[1]{\label{org9240374}Huh?}
  \end{description}
#end_latex

The issue seems to be that the article and beamer classes are 
handling footnotes differently. Removing 
\footnotetext[1]{\label{org9240374}Huh?} removes the duplicate 
from the beamer export, but then the article export is missing the 
appropriate footnote.

We should be able to patch the export code to ignore the extra 
\footnotetext when exporting to beamer. 

Cheers,

-- 
Adrian Bradd