From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: attachment: link type export to HTML invalid attach dir Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:58:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87a75aeq3o.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87pnfhrob4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <871rrvrw0b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87muairkam.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y2th0yc7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878sle1ng9.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <875zgausnb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87o8u2tbhg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zhdlctsm.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a75lt7nc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d0ag29kk.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7zrradl.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <871rqphaxo.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r1yp36ht.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34405) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j5UMG-0002Dk-4d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 07:58:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5UME-0006Xl-U5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 07:58:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87r1yp36ht.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:20:14 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bastien Cc: Gustav =?utf-8?Q?Wikstr=C3=B6m?= , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hello, Bastien writes: > Thanks a lot -- feel free to apply it when you think it's okay. I'd like to hear from Gustav, too, since this affects the changes he introduced. If you are in a hurry, we can also apply it. Up to you. > Also, perhaps can you or Gustav suggest a way to test the new feature > so that we can test this new code? I don't use the feature. I just tried to avoid introducing regressions. It is related to how attachments are opened, and exported. I guess testing should focus on this, in particular export of attached images, i.e., attachements with an image extension. > Do you want to do this for 9.4 or can it be done later on? This can be done later on. I don't have time to work on this. Of course, if someone wants to do it, that would be great, too. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou