From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id YNnCMP3c52NlbAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 19:22:53 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id ALyLMP3c52Oi0QAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 19:22:53 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896AB3B94B for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 19:22:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pQuW3-00019b-Ue; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 13:22:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pQuW0-00018g-95 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 13:22:24 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pQuVv-0004US-VW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 13:22:22 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 670A8240435 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 19:22:17 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1676139737; bh=IagXI20G39eU03QjwwuuBI+DkT11tKPziP1BVs6U2xc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=SvZ+R9CfMA+sqvCQGGrGVfNESlSHsRXvx5AEwTYo9VonWM0Rv3mMuGiRylPlRzBbP ug1Eh64PbftJYDNjFh8yuRor/lRUCjLS7l82AxJt78G0Rs5NqKMfl5bkHo0bLEoRpz uWlM1TRrKq88AxsL1rAaAxVD71C+0Jde8CJNstQUDGLAXxdABh5HtqKKrdyJK+gOwA TU4EPDSPvBgNSyJR2SzO4Ske4sZ7yWgLo0khD8gFcAfoJXfVTUlSVf9YAAndp2LfDp 305uOF6/YkZMHAmR9aDNIEaalKVbUeQaGNVeySGakeLjHwQfeiQxKpU6fed901Lcan EDj5dCRJNa4og== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4PDf8S716zz9rxB; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 19:22:16 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr Cc: emacs-orgmode Subject: Re: Should we extend org-catch-invisible-edits to more interactive commands? (was: Catching invisible edits: problem understanding doc) In-Reply-To: <25575.52322.757469.405610@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <25573.3996.714544.156631@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87bkm1etd9.fsf@localhost> <25575.52322.757469.405610@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 18:22:58 +0000 Message-ID: <87a61kukn1.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1676139773; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=YNyXtJyg9EZlDwxkmdwkepyPdLr6c2/o2NRSwoJ5xAs=; b=fN9ODWy/f4IS2MQfEEmzsjmsWn1m8SXX0c2ZJIAZoNxB39FK+sXvtDhrwIRreYC5OTpnVK A216J6LH3S++VOEtNp1sTSPhcI1BsRponOugx81aUP/oeHYhMm91vWAWVKbcbyXWty+2VZ vknFxZwrgPywIHtflouabAjLkMwoC8S4YosJMfql/xS7Mle3ocCn0Ine5TpOHuift91Bc2 8HgHpkI99YkpYpS3tjhZqEacrKwtOGnu5tBjuKLjBUtBmKptNqanq6qIUWErd/f5xlgw5M KmgoSzSqILsOIhT77TaePqGaxlVq5efbyfA36Q2GVKuntVNKoW9tWrDITicuxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=SvZ+R9Cf; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1676139773; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=WYYvuaxjW4U+Wr6w+ZuquQ7bNupoEjVgM+mnIoG/N67MhLS60tr5UlnNJtnDR4jaYW1oLw GDUQTdE9PYyHV+tdRJx9WEs22Ag77nu8w94sdLxclddGQyTZVMDFxdAfWE4eo1xVLSeZEs 3XiwhN5hf6qgL9R9uz9Fq4MLjEPFotYlM1ZoN3cK3y+nymfY+GxosOHZDSCELVhrQjFqMq ku/lph4jVjxKFon7mu0ykfg2Gi12d/rYKpPhS8OAgD+ZIlxcJBj9PVk3Go/O868bvYaTo2 VZJID7g0Zl+ksoaEhvPanQm9OayY0aLCFFcPe1dkOT7hdTWYnIemdnLFmwXb8g== X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 896AB3B94B X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=SvZ+R9Cf; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.88 X-Spam-Score: -7.88 X-TUID: qbca7WV3vD8F Alain.Cochard@unistra.fr writes: > At any rate, shouldn't "2.2.3 Catching invisible edits" be a little > bit more specific about what kind of invisible edits are concerned? > Or perhaps just a warning that it is not all of them. We can indeed at such warning, but it will probably be not very helpful. Only typing, deleting char forward/backward and meta-return are considering invisible edits now. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at