From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Blank lines in literal html
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 01:07:05 +0000
Message-ID: <878x44ekw6.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <475453D3.30604@gmail.com> <4756FC88.1050701@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J1AdT-0000By-4S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:07:11 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J1AdR-0000Bm-Rb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:07:10 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1AdR-0000Bj-OI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:07:09 -0500
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1J1AdR-0000xI-7I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:07:09 -0500
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so744063nfh
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:07:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4756FC88.1050701@gmail.com> (Wanrong Lin's message of "Wed, 05
	Dec 2007 14:31:20 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Wanrong Lin <wanrong.lin@gmail.com>
Cc: org-mode list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Wanrong,

Wanrong Lin <wanrong.lin@gmail.com> writes:

> Finally, I decided to learn some elisp debugging techniques and as a
> practice, it seems I found the bug and fixed it with this patch (against
> org.el in 5.16b)
>
> @@ -24437,7 +24437,7 @@
>           (when (re-search-backward
>              "\\(<p>\\)\\([ \t\r\n]*\\)\\=" (- (point) 100) t)
>         (setq par (match-string 1))
> -        (replace-match "\\2\n"))
> +        (replace-match ""))
>           (insert line "\n")
>           (while (and lines
>               (get-text-property 0 'org-protected (car lines)))
>
> I am not completely sure whether this is the right fix, but so far the
> output looks OK to me.

Thanks for this.  I think the patch is safe (I'm testing it for two or
three days now) but I cannot predict it will be in any cases.  I guess
Carsten will have a better call on this.

(BTW, the issue your raising here concerns the way the HTML code *looks*
and IMO they are less important than issues regarding the correctness of
the HTML code... Just a thought.)

-- 
Bastien