From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Davison Subject: Re: Re: Limited #+INCLUDE ? Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:19:04 -0400 Message-ID: <878w88k8k7.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> References: <874oj2v2a6.fsf@tandberg.com> <87k4ruy5pd.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87eii26lzg.fsf@stats.ox.ac.uk> <878w89l2pq.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> <87wrvtyln2.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O6qJL-0007tb-Uc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:19:11 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37764 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6qJK-0007qk-La for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:19:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6qJJ-0000Vd-AG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:19:10 -0400 Received: from markov.stats.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.210.1]:59810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6qJI-0000VI-WF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:19:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:52:26 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Samuel Wales writes: > Another way to look at it is that this is an annotation mechanism. It > can be used for any type of file or buffer. This would include text, > websites (i.e. pointing to and annotating documents on the web), > dired, source code, org files, html source, etc. > > Modifying existing link syntax will be difficult, especially because > there might be additional features we need a year or two from now. > For maximum flexibility and simplicity, this might be a good first use > of extensible syntax. Hi Samuel, I'm not quite clear what you're referring to when you say "this" in the above sentences. Also, when you say "extensible syntax", are you referring to the existing link syntax, or to a proposed extension? Thanks, Dan > > Samuel